Summer 2007 Turn-around for trees Promotional Pointers Garden MessengerPlant Promotions for 2007 Plant SpotlightHelping you pick the winners! For beautiful blossom in spring and attractive fruits and foliage in autumn,Malus or ornamental apple, is hard to beat. Add to this their compact size andthe availability of varieties that are resistant to scab and mildew and you've gotthe ideal tree for most gardens. This fact is reflected in the way that many gar-den writers list Malus among their top small garden trees.
Most often, when a man first has problems with lowered potency or with sexual dysfunction viagra australia shipping to pharmacies, paying purveyors, training personnel, or having a huge advertising budget.
Frequency of Tumor Lysis Syndrome in Aggressive and Slow
Introduction Chemotherapy in Children with ALL
Hashemi A 1, Shahvazian N 2, Zarezade A 2, Shakiba M 3, Atefi A 4
1- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology, Oncology and Genetics Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and
Health Services, Yazd, Iran
2- General Practitioner , Yazd, Iran
3- Department of Pediatrics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran
4- Hematology, Oncology and Genetics Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd,
Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) is an oncologic emergency that results from massive lysis of
malignant cells. The incidence of TLS depends on the risk factors, such as baseline
hyperuricemia, bulky tumor burden, elevated serum LDH, and elevated WBC. The objectives of
the present study were to assess frequency of Tumor Lysis Syndrom in children with ALL in two
methods of induction chemotherapy, aggressive and slow induction.
Materials and Methods
In this double blind randomized interventional study, the number of 60 ALL patients in the
Shahid Sadoughi Hospital Yazd were studied. They randomly treated using two various
methods; 30 patients by invasive and 30 by slow induction chemotherapy.
From 60 patients, 10 cases (16.6%) developed Tumor lysis syndrome. Seven of 10 treated by
aggressive chemotherapy and remaining 3 by slow chemotherapy. No significant differences
were found (PV= 0.166) between them.
Based on this study there was no significant difference between Tumor Lysis Syndrom in
aggressive induction chemotherapy and slow induction, but WBC and LDH levels before
treatment can predict Tumor Lysis Syndrom.
ALL, Tumor Lysis Syndrome,Induction Chemotherapy
Hashemi A MD. Hematology, Oncology and Genetics Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of
Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran Email: Dr_a_hashemi@yahoo.com
Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Vol1. No1. Introduction
Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) is an oncologic emergency that results from massive lysis of
rapidly proliferating malignant cells. TLS characterize by hyperuricemia, hyper kalemia and
hyperphosphatemia, which might lead to hypocalcemia with tetanus or other potentially life
threatening complications. Arrhythmias occur as a result of hyperkalemia in 5% of the patients
and are the most common cause of death in TLS. TLS usually develops shortly after the start of
the effective cytotoxic therapy and it may lead to acute renal failure and death. It usually happens
either before or within 1-5 days of after starting specific anti-leukemia therapy (1, 2, 3).
TLS is commonly seen in tumors with a high mitotic rate such as Burkitt lymphoma or T cell
leukemia. It is less common in AML and pre-B-ALL and could occur with CML with the
administration of combined cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is rarely reported after single-agent
corticosteroid therapy (3, 4, 5).
The incidence of TLS is 3% to 22%, which depends on the patients risk factors such as baseline
hyperuricemia, bulky tumor burden (more than 10cm), concentrated acidic urine ph, elevated
serum LDH, elevated WBC (more than 100000/μl), first course chemotherapy in patients with
bulky tumor, hematological malignancies with a high proliferative index, and volume depletion
The prevention of TLS is as important as its diagnosis and management. The regimen of
hydration (2-4 maintenance), alkalinization (to keep urine ph between 7 and 7.5) and allopurinol
prevent clinically significant TLS (3).
Allopurinol could treat hyperuricemia of malignancy, but is associated with drawbacks.
Rasburicase which recently become available in the united stats, provides a safe and effective
alternative to allopurinol. It decreases uric acid levels and prevents uric acid nephropathy (1).
ALL is a heterogeneous disease has led to treatment directed according to phenotype, genotype,
and risk. Thus, mature B cell ALL is the only subtype that is treated with short-term intensive
chemotherapy (7, 8).
The goal of induction therapy is to eradicate more than 99 percent of the initial burden of
leukemia cells, restore normal hematopoiesis, and a normal performance status. This treatment
phase almost always includes the administration of a glucocorticoid (prednisone, prednisolone,
or dexamethasone), vincristine, and at least one other agent (usually asparaginase, an
anthracycline, or both). Children and nearly all young adults with high-risk ALL receive four or
more drugs during induction therapy. Overly aggressive induction therapy might lead to
increased morbidity and mortality (9, 10, 11).
Dexamethasone has good penetration into the central nervous system with long half-life, which
provides better control in the central nervous system than prednisone or prednisolone (12, 13).
The objectives of the present study were to asses frequency of Tumor Lysis Syndrom in children
with ALL in two methods of induction chemotherapy, aggressive and slow induction.
Materials and Methods
In this double blind randomized interventional study, the number of 60 ALL patients from 2007
until the end of 2008 in the Shahid Sadoughi Hospital Yazd were studied. They randomly
allocated in two groups, which one group had invasive chemotherapy and other group slow
induction. The patients included 36(60%) boys and 24(40%) girls aged between 1 to 10 years old
(Average 6 years old).
Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Vol1. No1. In this study laboratory finding in patients before chemotherapy and 48 and 72 hours after
chemotherapy was assessed. They included potassium, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid, urea,
creatinine, alkalinphosphatas, LDH, and WBC.
Statistical methods included Fisher exact and Chi square were analyzed the findings.
From 60 patients, 10 cases (16.6%) developed Tumor lysis syndrome, which 7(23%) received
aggressive chemotherapy and 3 (10%) slow chemotherapy. No significant differences were
found (PV=0.166) between them (table1).
Table1: Frequency of TLS in the two groups of patients
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
These was no significant relation between sex and age of patients with TLS (PV>0.05).
Table2: Frequency of TLS in WBC and LDH groups
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent The relationship between LDH and WBC before treatment with TLS, were significant (LDH
=PV: 0.005, WBC= PV: 0.023) in this table.
Based on this study there was no significant difference between TLS in aggressive induction
chemotherapy and slow introduction, and WBC and LDH levels before treatment could predict
The acute tumor lysis syndrome has been reported most commonly after combination
chemotherapy, all in patients with non-Hodgkin‘s lymphoma. Dhingra an Newcom (1988)
described an acute tumor lysis syndrome. Single agent corticosteroid treatment in a patient with
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma caused renal failure 72 h after dexamethasone therapy. Sparano et al
(1990) described a patient developing life threatening hyperkalaemia within 12 h after 100 mg
dexametasone. Acute tumor lysis syndrome occurs rarely after single agent corticosteroid
therapy, but scientists believe that prescribing corticosteroids for patients with bulky disease
Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Vol1. No1. non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or leukaemia should be aware of this potentially life-threatening
complication and monitor the patient very closely (14).
One study suggested that an increased dose of prednisolone in the context of other intensive
treatment can yield results similar to those achieved with dexamethasone (15). Imatinib
mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has enhanced the management of leukemia with BCR-ABL
fusion, especially in elderly adults. Imatinib either as a single agent or as part of combination
regimens has successfully induced or consolidated remissions (16, 17). However, its capacity to
improve the cure rate remains uncertain. It has clearly contributed to extend disease-free survival
and improve quality of life among these patients.
The incidence of TLS can range from 3% to 22% such as Bulky tumor burden (>10cm), elevated
WBC (leukemia) and elevated LDH (5, 6).
Kapoor et al defined 22% of ALL cases and 15% AML cases presented with hyperleucocytosis.
They reported WBC level before treatment can predict tumor lysis syndrome(3). This is
concordance with present studies. However, limited study was reported.
Michael B.Davidson et al described the metabolic and electrolyte disturbances of tumor lysis
syndrome may be concurrently exacerbated by renal failure. Patients may be treated with
Allopurinol, hydration, urinary alkalinization, or hemodialysis. Rasburicase was recently
approved in the United States, and may be more effective than allopurinol (1).
One randomized study demonstrated more rapid control and lower levels of plasma uric acid in
patients who received rasburicase compared to allopurinol that is effective alternative to
allopurinol during chemotherapy (18).
Prevention of TLS is to identify patients at risk and follow them clearly by testing those 48 hours
after chemotherapy. The first step in prevention of TLS is to minimize the risk factors during the
high risk period, which starts from 3 days before to 7 days after chemotherapy (5).
In conclusion, based on this study there was no significant difference between tumor lysis
syndrom in aggressive induction and slow induction chemotherapy, but WBC and LDH levels
before treatment could predict tumor lysis syndrom.
1. Davidson MB, Thakkar S, Hix J, Bhandarkar ND, Wong A, Schreiber MJ. Pathophysiology, Clinical
Consequences, and Treatment of Tumor Lysis Syndrome.The American Journal of Medicine 2004; 116:546-
2. Retal D. High Dose Chemotherpy with Autologous Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantaion in an
Anephric Child with Multiple Recurrent Wilms Tumor. J Pediatric Hematol/Oncol 1998;20(4):357-360.
3. Kapoor G. Supportive care for children with leukemias, at diagnosis and during therapy at peripheral
centers. Indian Journal of Medical and Pediatric Oncology 2004;25 (2):24-26.
4. Duzova A, Cetin M, Gurmrak F, Yetgin S. Acute tumor lysis syndrom following a single dose
corticosterod in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. European Journal of Haematology2001; 66(6):
5. Wossmann W, Schrappe M, Meyer U. Incidence of tumor lysis syndrome in children with advanced stage
Burkitt's lymphoma/leukemia before and after introduction of prophylactic use of urate oxidase. Ann
Hematol 2003; 82:160–165.
6. Ao H. Tumor Lysis Syndrome. Prevention and Management Strategies. Oncology Special Edition
7. Patte C, Auperin A, Michon J. The Société Française d'Oncologie Pédiatrique LMB89 protocol: highly
effective multiagent chemotherapy tailored to the tumor burden and initial response in 561 unselected
children with B-cell lymphomas and L3 leukemia. Blood 2001; 97:3370-3379.
8. Lee EJ, Petroni GR, Schiffer CA. Brief-duration high-intensity chemotherapy for patients with small
noncleaved-cell lymphoma or FAB L3 acute lymphocytic leukemia: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group
B study 9251. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:4014-4022.
Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Vol1. No1. 9. Gaynon PS, Trigg ME, Heerema NA. Children's Cancer Group trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic
leukemia: 1983-1995.Leukemia 2000;14:2223-2233.
10. Pession A, Valsecchi MG, Masera G. Long-term results of a randomized trial on extended use of high
dose of L-asparaginase for standard risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2005;
11. Hurwitz CA, Silverman LB, Schorin MA. Substituting dexamethasone for prednisone complicates
remission induction in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 2000; 88:1964-1969.
12. Bostrom BC, Sensel MR, Sather HN. Dexamethasone versus prednisone and daily oral versus weekly
intravenous mercaptopurine for patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the
Children's Cancer Group. Blood 2003; 101:3809- 3817.
13. Mitchell CD, Richards SM, Kinsey SE. Benefit of dexamethasone compared with prednisolone for
childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of the UK Medical Research Council ALL 97 randomized
trial. Br J Haematol 2005; 129:734-745.
14. Sparano J, Ramirex M, Wiernik PH. Increasing recognition of corticosteroid-induced tumor lysis
syndrome in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer 1990; 65:1072-1073.
15. Igarashi S, Manabe A, Ohara A. No advantage of dexamethasone over prednisolone for the outcome of
standard- and intermediaterisk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Tokyo Children's Cancer Study
Group L95-14 protocol. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:6489- 6498.
16. Thomas DA, Faderl S, Cortes J. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic
leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate. Blood 2004; 103:4396-4407.
17. Lee S, Kim YJ, Min CK. The effect of first-line imatinib interim therapy on the outcome of allogeneic
stem cell transplantation in adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute
lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2005; 105:3449-3457.
18. Goldman SC, Holcenberg JS, Finklestein JZ, Hutchinson R, Kreissman S, Johnson FL, et al. A
randomized Comparison between Rasburicase and Allopurinol in children with Lymphoma or Leukemia at
high risk for Tumor lysis. The American Society of Hematology 2001;97(10):2998-3003.
Iranian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Vol1. No1.
Detection, Occurrence, and Fate of Emerging Contaminants in Agricultural Environments Daniel D. Snow1, Shannon L. Bartelt-Hunt2, Samuel E. Saunders3 and David A. Cassada4 ‘Emerging' contaminants are any synthetic or steroid hormones and other endocrine-disrupting naturally-occurring chemical or microorganism not commonly monitored in the environment. These "new"