Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published August 13, 2014 The Fault Lies on the Other Side: Altered Brain Functional Connectivity in PsychiatricDisorders is Mainly Caused by Counterpart Regions in the Opposite Hemisphere Jie Zhang1,2,†, Keith M. Kendrick3,†, Guangming Lu4,2 and Jianfeng Feng1,2,5 1Centre for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, PR China, 2Fudan University – Jinling HospitalComputational Translational Medicine Center, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210002, PR China,3Key Laboratory for Neuro Information, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, School of Life Science andTechnology, Chengdu 610054, PR China, 4Department of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School ofMedicine, Nanjing 210002, PR China and 5Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
On the partner website levitra cost per pill given a complete description how to take these tablets. Be sure to check before use.Je l'ai acheté le médicament cialis prix deux ou trois fois, l'effet est des pilules superbes, je ne ne nous a pas déçus même si je suis au dernier étage sur la pilule. Männer werden empfohlen, für mindestens 30 Minuten für den angeblichen Geschlechtsverkehr durchschnittliche Rendite von cialis 20mg zu verwenden.
A modular positive feedback-based gene amplifierNistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4http://www.jbioleng.org/content/4/1/4 A modular positive feedback-based geneamplifier Goutam J Nistala1†, Kang Wu2†, Christopher V Rao2*, Kaustubh D Bhalerao1 Background: Positive feedback is a common mechanism used in the regulation of many gene circuits as it canamplify the response to inducers and also generate binary outputs and hysteresis. In the context of electrical circuitdesign, positive feedback is often considered in the design of amplifiers. Similar approaches, therefore, may beused for the design of amplifiers in synthetic gene circuits with applications, for example, in cell-based sensors.
Results: We developed a modular positive feedback circuit that can function as a genetic signal amplifier,heightening the sensitivity to inducer signals as well as increasing maximum expression levels without the needfor an external cofactor. The design utilizes a constitutively active, autoinducer-independent variant of the quorum-sensing regulator LuxR. We experimentally tested the ability of the positive feedback module to separately amplifythe output of a one-component tetracycline sensor and a two-component aspartate sensor. In each case, thepositive feedback module amplified the response to the respective inducers, both with regards to the dynamicrange and sensitivity.
Conclusions: The advantage of our design is that the actual feedback mechanism depends only on a single geneand does not require any other modulation. Furthermore, this circuit can amplify any transcriptional signal, not justone encoded within the circuit or tuned by an external inducer. As our design is modular, it can potentially beused as a component in the design of more complex synthetic gene circuits.
showed that positive feedback could be used to generate Positive feedback is a common mechanism involved in hysteresis with respect to an inducer in mammalian the regulation of genetic circuits Any time a gene cells. Maeda and Sano analyzed a synthetic positive product has the capacity to enhance its own production, feedback loop in E. coli and demonstrated that it could either directly or indirectly, the circuit is said to involve give rise to either a graded or hysteretic response positive feedback. A number of behaviors can be attribu- depending on the specific configuration. In terms of ted to positive feedback loops. The defining one is building circuits, Ajo-Franklin and coworkers  clearly amplification. More complex behaviors include demonstrated that positive feedback could be used to bistability and hysteresis. In addition, positive feedback engineer memory into yeast cells. Stricker and cowor- is an integral element in many oscillatory, pattern-for- kers on the other hand, built a simple oscillator by mation, and intracellular polarization processes coupling positive feedback with negative feedback. In In a number of synthetic biology applications, positive work most closely related to the present study, Sayut feedback has been used to design switches, oscillators, and coworkers [demonstrated that a positive feed- and amplifiers. Besckei and coworkers for example, back loop could make the transcriptional activity of the showed in yeast that a simple positive feedback loop quorum-sensing regulator LuxR more sensitive to auto- could transform a graded response to an inducer into a inducer. In these regards, their design is most closely binary one. Likewise, Kramer and Fussenegger  related to how positive feedback is typically employed inelectronic circuits, namely to amplify the response to asignal.
* Correspondence: † Contributed equally In this work, we constructed a modular genetic ampli- 2Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois fier in Escherichia coli based on a constitutively active, at Urbana-Champaign, 600 S Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA 2010 Nistala et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Nistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4 autoinducer-independent variant of the quorum-sensing Table 1 Plasmids used in this study regulator LuxR from Vibrio fischeri Our goal was Relevant characteristic to develop a simple network component that could be bla Plpp-taz ori p15A coupled to any cell-based sensing system where the out- cm PLtetO-1 ori ColE1 put involves the transcription of some gene. In these kan GFP[tagless] ori p15A regards, we sought to engineer an "off the shelf" device that could be readily implemented in any gene circuit.
LlacO-1-luc ori ColE1 To test the ability of this device to amplify a transcrip- kan PLtetO-1 ori ColE1 tional output, we coupled our device to a one-compo- kan Plac/ara-1 ori pSC101 nent tetracycline sensor and a two-component aspartate cm Plac/ara-1-luxR-luxI ori ColE1 sensor. In both cases, we found that our amplifier was kan PLtetO-1 ori p15A able to increase the sensitivity to the input signal and kan PLtetO-1-luxR * ori p15A intensify the output signal.
kan PLtetO-1-luxRΔ2-156 ori p15A kan PLtetO-1-luxRΔ2-162 ori p15A cm Plux ori ColE1 Media, growth conditions, and bacterial strains All cultures experiments were performed in either OmpC-luxRΔ2-162 ori p15A Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (tryptone: 10 g/L, yeast extract: lux -GFP [tagless]-luxRΔ2-162 ori 5 g/L, and NaCl: 10 g/L) or M9 minimal media supple- cm Plux-GFP[tagless] ori ColE1 ment with 0.4% glucose, 1 μg/mL thiamine, and 1 μg/ mL biotin. All experiments were performed at 37°C LtetO-1 ori ColE1 unless noted otherwise. Antibiotics were used at the fol- bla PLtetO-1-taz ori ColE1 lowing concentrations: ampicillin at 100 μg/mL, chlor- bla PLtetO-1-taz ori pSC101 amphenicol at 20 μg/mL, and kanamycin at 40 μg/mL.
Plasmids are from this study unless noted otherwise.
Primers were purchased from IDT Inc. (Coralville, IA).
Restriction enzymes were purchased from New EnglandBiolabs Inc. (Ipswitch, MA) and Fermentas Inc. (Glen origin from pZA34-luc using the restriction sites XbaI Burnie, MD) and used according to the manufacturer's and SacI and by swapping the chloramphenicol resis- tance gene with the kanamycin resistance gene from All cloning steps were performed in E. coli strain pZE21 using the restriction sites XhoI and SacI. The DH5a. Subsequent experiments involving anhydrotetra- plasmid pPROTetE-Amp was made by replacing cycline induction were conducted in E. coli strain the chloramphenicol resistance gene in pPROTet.E with GN100 (F- ilvG rfb-50 rph-1 ΔenvZ::FRT attBl::[PN25- the ampicillin resistance gene from pZE12 using the tetR lacIq spcR]) and those involving aspartate induction restriction sites XhoI and SacI.
were performed in GN101 (F- ilvG rfb-50 rph-1 ΔenvZ:: The luxI-GFP transcriptional fusion was made first by FRT). Strain GN100 was constructed first by P1vir PCR amplification of the luxI promoter using the plasmid transduction of the ΔenvZ::kan insert from JW3367-3 pluxGFPuv [as the template with the primers (The E. coli Genetic Stock Center, CGSC# 10509) into KW134F (CAG ATA TCG ACG TCA GTC C) and MG1655. The antibiotic cassette from the FRT-Kan- KW134R2 (ATA GAA TTC TGC GTT TAT TCG ACT FRT insert was then removed by transformation of ATA AC). The resulting fragment was then cloned into pCP20 into the strain and selection on ampicillin at the plasmid pPROTet.E using the restriction sites EcoRI 30°C . Loss of the helper plasmid pCP20 was and AatII, yielding the plasmid pGN23. The green fluor- obtained by growth at 42°C under non-selective condi- escent protein (GFP) was PCR amplified from pPROBE- tions on LB agar. Lastly, the chromosomally integrated gfp[tagless] ] using primers GN10F (GGG GAA TTC TetR/LacI expression cassette from DH5aZ1 was ATA CGT ATT TAA ATC AGG AGT GGA AAT GAG moved into this strain by P1vir transduction, yielding TAA AGG AGA AGA ACT T) and GN10R (GGG GGA GN100. Similarly, strain GN101 was constructed in an TCC TTA TTA TTT GTA TAG TTC ATC CA). The identical manner except that it does not harbor the resulting fragment was then cloned into the EcoRI and TetR/LacI expression cassette from DH5aZ1.
BamHI restriction sites of the pGN23, yielding the plas-mid pGN69.
Plasmids Construction The LuxR* (LuxR[A221V]) expression plasmids were Table provides a list of the plasmids used in this constructed using two rounds of PCR. In the first study. The plasmid pPROTetE-Kan-p15A was made by round, the luxR gene was amplified with primers swapping the ColE1 origin of pPROTet.E with the p15A KW78F1 (AAC TTT ATA AGG AGG AAA AAC ATA Nistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4 TGA AAA ACA TAA ATG CCG AC) and KW078R TGT TAT TAA CCC). The PCR product was then (ACT GTC GAC TTA ATT TTT AAA GTA TGG GC) digested with XhoI and EcoRI and sub-cloned into the using pLuxRI [as the template. The resulting pro- respective sites of pPROTetE-Kan-p15A, thus replacing duct was then used as a template for a second round of the native PLtetO-1 promoter with the PompC promoter.
PCR this time using primers KW078F2 (TAT GAA The primers GN06F2 (GGG GTC GAC ATG CCT TCT TTC AAC TAA AGA TTA ACT TTA TAA GGA GGA CTA GTT GAT AA) and KW171R were used to AAA ACA) and KW078R. It was then digested with amplify luxRΔ2-162 using pGN68 as the template. The EcoRI and SalI and sub-cloned into the EcoRI and SalI resulting PCR product was digested with SalI and NotI cut-sites of pPROTetE-Kan-p15A. Enzymatic inverse and then sub-cloned into the respective sites of pPRO- PCR was used to introduce the Ala221Val (GCG- > TetE-Kan-p15A, yielding pGN62.
GTG) point mutation in the luxR gene with primers The aspartate sensor module was constructed first KW079F (ATA GGT CTC TGT GCA AAT GAA ACT amplifying the taz gene from pTJ003 using the primers CAA TAC AAC) and KW079R (ATA GGT CTC TGC GN13F (GGG GAA TTC TTA AAG AGG AGA AAG ACA TTG GTT AAA TGG AAA GTG A). The result- GTA CCC ATG ATT AAC CGT ATC C) and GN12R ing PCR product was then digested with BsaI and (GGG GTC GAC TTA CCC TTC TTT TGT CGT ligated to obtain pGN3.
GCC CT). The PCR product was then digested with The luxRΔ2-156 expression plasmid was also con- EcoRI and SacI and cloned into the unique respective structed using two rounds of PCR. The luxR gene was restriction sites, yielding pGN76. The ColE1 origin in first amplified with primers KW112F (AAC TTT ATA pGN76 was then replaced with the pSC101 origin from AGG AGG AAA AAC ATA TGA ACA TAC CAT the pZS24 plasmid using the restriction sites AvrII and TAA TTG TTC C) and KW078R using pLuxRI as the SacI, yielding pGN77.
template. The resulting PCR product was then amplifiedusing primers KW078F2 and KW078R. It was then Fluorescence Assays cloned into the EcoRI and SalI cut-sites of pPROTetE- To measure fluorescent protein expression, cultures Kan-p15A, yielding pGN11. Likewise, the luxRΔ2-162 were first grown overnight and then subcultured to an expression plasmid was made by amplifying the luxR OD600 of 0.05 in fresh media. The cultures were first gene with primers KW113F (CTT TAT AAG GAG allowed to grow to an OD600 of 0.20, at which point the GAA AAA CAT ATG CCT TCT CTA GTT GAT AAT inducer was added. The cultures were then grown over- TAT C) and KW078R using pLuxRI as the template.
night prior to taking the measurements. 100 μL of the The resulting product was amplified again as before culture was then transferred into a 96 well microplate, using primers KW078F2 and KW078R. The PCR and the relative fluorescence and optical density at product was then digested with EcoRI and SalI and sub- 600 nm (OD600) were measured using a Tecan Safire2 cloned into the EcoRI and SalI cut-sites of pPROTetE- microplate reader. The fluorescence readings, given as Kan-p15A, yielding pGN12.
relative fluorescence units (RFU), were normalized with The positive-feedback module was constructed using the OD600 absorbance to account for cell density. All two rounds of PCR. In the first round, the primers experiments were performed in triplicate with 95% con- GN09F2 (AAC TAA AGA TTA ACT TTA TAA GGA fidence intervals reported.
GGA AAA ACA TAT GCC TTC TCT AGT TGA TAAT) and KW171R (AAT AGC GGC CGC TTA TTA Results and Discussion ATT TTT AAA GTA TGG GC) were used to amplify Design of positive-feedback amplifier the luxRΔ2-162 domain using pLuxRI [as the In order to construct a positive feedback circuit, we template. The resulting PCR product was then used as required a transcriptional activator that did not interfere template for a second round of PCR this time using pri- with native gene regulation in E. coli. In addition, we mers GN09F (GGG GGA TCC AAC TAA AGA TTA required that the activator be constitutively active and ACT TTA TAA GGA GGA AAA ACA T) and not dependent on the addition of an exogenous inducer.
KW171R (AAT AGC GGC CGC TTA TTA ATT TTT Given these constraints, we chose the LuxR protein AAA GTA TGG GC). The resulting fragment was then from Vibrio fischeri This protein, normally involved digested with BamHI and NotI and sub-cloned into in quorum sensing and bioluminescence, activates the pGN69, yielding pGN68.
transcription of the luxIADCBE operon in response to The aspartate positive feedback module was con- acyl homoserine lactone (AHL). AHL binding stabilizes structed first by amplifying the PompC promoter (geno- the LuxR dimer and, as a result, increases its ability to mic region 2310762-2310962) using primers GN03F activate transcription (GGG CTC GAG GTT CCC TTG CAT TTA CAT While wild-type LuxR does not appear to interfere TTT) and GN05R (GGG GAA TTC TAA CTT TCA with native E. coli regulation, it still requires an
Nistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4 exogenous inducer. However, a number of approaches relative to the wild-type control. Based on these results, exist for making constitutively active derivatives of LuxR we chose to use the LuxRΔ2-162 variant to design the and thus satisfying our design constraints. For example, an Ala221Val point mutation was previously found to To construct the amplifier, we cloned GFP and constitutively activate LuxR . The alanine at position LuxRΔ2-162 in a bicistronic configuration behind the 221 enables the N-terminal signaling domain to inhibit PluxI promoter on high-copy number plasmid (ColE1 the activity of the C-terminal, DNA-binding domain.
origin of replication). In this arrangement, LuxRΔ2-162 Presumably, mutating this residue to a valine prevents functions in a positive feedback loop as it can bind to the N-terminal domain from interfering with DNA the PluxI promoter and activate its own transcription binding. Consistent with this model, deleting the N- (Figure ). The reason we cloned LuxRΔ2-162 down- terminal domain of LuxR was also found to yield a con- stream of the GFP reporter is to control for polar effects stitutively active variant when we compared results involving positive feedback Based on these previous studies, we engineered three to those lacking it. To induce this circuit, we again used constitutively active variants of LuxR to test their suit- LuxRΔ2-162, this time as the input signal. In such a ability in designing an amplifier. The first, denoted by design, the output of the sensor is LuxRΔ2-162, which in LuxR*, harbors the Ala221Val point mutation. The turn feeds back into the amplifier. In these regards, other two, denoted by LuxRΔ2-156 and LuxRΔ2-162 LuxRΔ2-162 is used both as the input and positive feed- respectively, involved different N-terminal deletions, back signal. For the output, we used GFP as it provides where the subscript denotes the deleted fragment. To a facile measure of transcriptional activity. This choice test the relative effectiveness of these three different is in no way limiting, and any gene can in practice be constitutive LuxR variants, we determined how strongly used as the output.
they could activate expression from the PluxI promoter,using the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as our tran- Validation of amplifier using a tetracycline sensor scriptional readout. The results from these experiments We first tested the amplifier by coupling it to a one- are shown in Figure All of the LuxR variants, includ- component tetracycline sensor (Figure ). In this design, ing the wild-type control, were able to induce expression we cloned LuxRΔ2-162 behind the TetR-regulated PLtetO-1 from the PluxI promoter. Of the three, only LuxRΔ2-162 promoter on a compatible, medium copy-number plas- was capable in our hands of enhancing transcription mid (p15A origin of replication) In the absence ofthe tetracycline analogue, anhydrotetracycline (aTc),dimeric TetR binds to the O2 operator sites within thePLtetO-1 promoter and represses transcription. However,when TetR is bound with aTc, it no longer binds andrepresses the PLtetO-1 promoter, enabling dose-depen-dent control of gene expression. Thus, the aTc-induciblepromoter functions as a one-component tetracyclinesensor with LuxRΔ2-162 as the output.
To couple this sensor with the amplifier, we trans- formed cells (GN100) constitutively expressing a Figure 2 Schematic of positive-feedback amplifier. The basic Figure 1 Comparison of constitutive LuxR variants. In these design for the amplifier consists of GFP and LuxRΔ2-162 arranged in experiments, LuxR was expressed from a tetracycline-inducible a bicistronic configuration under the control of the PluxI promoter.
promoter, PLtetO-1, in strain GN101, which harbors a chromosomal LuxRΔ2-162 functions in a positive feedback loop as it can bind to copy of tetR. Activity was determined by the ability of these the PluxI promoter and activate its own transcription. In our design, different variants to induce expression from the PluxI promoter, LuxRΔ2-162 is also used as the input signal for the amplifier. LuxRΔ2- using GFP as the readout, in the absence of any autoinducer. Dark 162, therefore, functions both as the input and positive feedback bars denote the uninduced case and light bars the induced case signal. GFP, the output signal, provides a measure of transcriptional (200 ng/mL aTc). Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals.
Nistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4 Figure 3 Schematic of tetracycline sensor coupled to thepositive-feedback amplifier. The one-component tetracyclinesensor consists of a plasmid where LuxRΔ2-162 has been clonedbehind the TetR-regulated PLtetO-1 promoter. In the absence of theinducer anhydrotetracycline (aTc), dimeric TetR binds to the O2operator sites within the PLtetO-1 promoter and repressestranscription. However, when bound with aTc, TetR is no longerable to bind to the O2 operator sites within the promoter, thusenabling dose-dependent control of LuxRΔ2-162. This sensor wascoupled with the positive feedback amplifier, encoded on a Figure 4 Comparison of tetracycline sensor with positive separate plasmid, by transforming cells (GN100) constitutively feedback (solid circles) and without (solid square). Schematic of expressing a chromosomal copy of the tetR gene with the two positive feedback design is shown in Figure 3. The design lacking plasmids respectively harboring the sensor and amplifier.
positive feedback is otherwise identical to one with positivefeedback except that only GFP is expressed from the PluxI promoter.
In these experiments, cells were grown overnight at the indicated chromosomal copy of the tetR gene with the two plas- concentrations of aTc prior to measurements. The fluorescencevalues were normalized with the OD mids respectively harboring the sensor and amplifier 600 absorbance to account for cell density. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals for the (see Materials and Methods for details). A schematic of the integrated design is given in Figure When wetested this design, we found that the amplifierincreased both the sensitivity and dynamic range of multiple studies have shown that positive feedback can the integrated circuit relative to an otherwise identical lead to bistability and hysteresis Therefore, we circuit lacking positive feedback (Figure ). In particu- speculated that cells harboring the amplifier might be lar, we found that positive feedback increased the sen- able to "remember" previous exposures to aTc. How- sitivity to aTc by roughly two orders of magnitude. In ever, when we transferred cells from media containing other words, we observed equivalent levels of expres- aTc to media lacking it, we no longer observed any sion in the circuit involving positive feedback at aTc GFP expression relative to the background after we concentrations roughly one hundred times less than grew the cells up (data not shown). These results indi- those observed with the circuit lacking positive feed- cate the positive feedback loop involving LuxRΔ2-162 is back. Moreover, we found that positive feedback able to amplify the response to an inducer but is increased the dynamic range by roughly 50%. By range, incapable of sustaining the response in the absence of we mean the ratio of expression under saturating indu- cing (100 ng/ml aTc) and non-inducing (0 ng/ml aTc) Based on what we know about the properties of LuxR, specifically the role of AHL in stabilizing LuxR, In addition to these endpoint measurements, we also the reason the circuit does not sustain activation is performed kinetic experiments where we measured the likely due to the protein dimer being degraded too response over a twelve-hour interval to varying concen- quickly. In other words, we suspect that LuxRΔ2-162 trations of aTc (Figure Consistent with our end- dimer is being degraded at a rate greater than it is point measurements, we found that the design involving being produced by positive feedback alone (though we positive feedback was more sensitive to aTc and had a did not directly make this measurement). More specifi- wider dynamic range of expression levels. Collectively, cally, positive feedback alone is unable to sustain the these results demonstrate that our genetic amplifier is expression of LuxRΔ2-162 in the absence of some exo- capable of both increasing the sensitivity and dynamic genous source, in our case the one-component sensor.
range of this one-component tetracycline sensor.
That said, the positive feedback is still strong enough We last tested whether the amplifier would endow to amplify the response when an external input signal the cell with memory. While not a design goal,
Nistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4 Figure 6 Schematic of aspartate sensor coupled to thepositive-feedback amplifier. The two-component sensor consistsof the Taz sensor kinase and the OmpR response regulator. Tazcontrols the level of phosphorylated OmpR (OmpR-P), which in turnactivates the expression from the PompC promoter. When the Tazsensor kinase is bound with aspartate, it increases the levels ofOmpR-P, leading to increased expression from the PompC promoter.
In our design, the Taz sensor kinase has been cloned behind theconstitutive PLtetO-1 promoter on one plasmid (the cells used inthese experiments do not possess TetR). On a second plasmid,LuxRΔ2-162 has been cloned behind the PompC promoter, resulting inthe expression of LuxRΔ2-162 being aspartate dependent. The thirdplasmid harbors the positive feedback amplifier. The sensor was Figure 5 Kinetic analysis of tetracycline sensor with positive coupled to the amplifier by transforming the three plasmids into a feedback (A) and without (B). In these experiments, cells were ΔenvZ null mutant (GN101).
grown for 12 hours at varying levels of aTc induction withmeasurements taken every hour. The fluorescence values werenormalized with the OD600 absorbance to account for cell density.
The scale for both sets of experiments is the same. Error bars To construct the integrated circuit in E. coli, we trans- denote 95% confidence intervals for the measurement average.
formed a ΔenvZ null mutant (GN101) with these threeplasmids.
Similar to what we observed with the one-component Validation of amplifier using an aspartate sensor tetracycline receptor, we found that the amplifier We next tested the amplifier by coupling it to a two- increased both the range and sensitivity when coupled component aspartate sensor (Figure To do this, we to the two-component aspartate sensor as compared to used the hybrid Tar-EnvZ (Taz) sensor kinase [. This an otherwise identical circuit lacking positive feedback chimeric, transmembrane sensor kinase controls the (Figure Unlike the case with the one-component sen- levels of phosphorylated OmpR, which in turn activates sor, we observed only a minor increase in sensitivity.
the expression from the PompC promoter. When the Taz However, we observed a significant amplification of the sensor kinase is bound with aspartate, it increases the response. In particular, the amplifier increased the levels of OmpR-P, leading to increased expression from dynamic range by roughly an order of magnitude the PompC promoter. In addition to amino acids, EnvZ whereas the sensitivity increased by approximately a fac- chimeras have been constructed to sense other inputs tor of two. While these results demonstrate that the such as sugars and light amplifier is modular as it can readily be applied to dif- In order to couple the two-component aspartate sen- ferent sensor systems, they also demonstrate that the sor with our genetic amplifier, we cloned LuxRΔ2-162 performance of the amplifier is context dependent. In behind PompC promoter on a compatible, medium copy- particular, we observed mostly an increase in the range number plasmid (p15A origin of replication). To intro- when the amplifier was coupled to the two-component duce the Taz sensor kinase into E. coli, we cloned this aspartate sensor kinase and, conversely, mostly an gene behind the constitutive PLtetO-1 promoter on a increase in sensitivity when it was coupled to the one- compatible, low copy-number plasmid (pSC101 origin of component tetracycline sensor.
replication). Note, these experiments were performed in We note that we observed only weak activation, cells lacking a chromosomal copy of the tetR gene, so roughly two-fold, in response to aspartate in the absence the PLtetO-1 promoter in this background is constitutive.
of positive feedback. This level of activation is less than
Nistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4 In addition to sensing applications, the amplifier can also be used to create devices of greater complexity infunction. One intriguing application concerns impe-dance matching. Impedance mismatch occurs when theoutput range of one sub-circuit does not match theinput range of another sub-circuit to which it is con-nected. To effectively link these two sub-circuits, therespective output and input ranges should match oneanother. As positive feedback can significantly alter theresponse of a sub-circuit, it can be used as an ‘impe-dance matching' device by coupling two different sub-circuit circuits together that have disparate requirementsfor signal levels to operate correctly.
A primary goal of synthetic biology is to design modu- lar components with defined behavior that can be reusedin diverse applications The ideal componentshould have predicable behavior regardless of the contextin which it is applied. This is a significant challenge. Even Figure 7 Comparison of sensor output in the presence (solid in our experiments, while we rightly hypothesized that circles) and absence (solid squares) of the positive feedbackamplifier. Schematic of positive feedback design is shown in we would see amplification due to the positive feedback, Figure 6. The design lacking positive feedback is otherwise identical we see a different response when we coupled the ampli- to one with positive feedback except that only GFP is expressed fier to the two different sensors. For instance, the tetracy- from the PluxI promoter. In these experiments, cells were grown cline sensor showed a major increase in sensitivity but overnight at the indicated concentrations of aspartate prior to only moderate increase in the dynamic response. The measurements. The fluorescence values were normalized with theOD aspartate sensor, however, showed a major increase in 600 absorbance to account for cell density. Inset figure shows the magnification of the response for the design lacking positive the dynamic response but only a moderate increase in feedback. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals for measured sensitivity. Moreover, the amplifier increased background expression in the case of the aspartate sensor but not inthe case of the tetracycline sensor. The origins of these what has been previously observed in other studies differences are unknown, but may arise due to variations, using Taz, where the degree of activation is greater than for example, in plasmid copy number, promoter ten fold However, unlike our design, these stu- strengths, and the metabolic burden imposed by each cir- dies measured the expression from the PompC promoter.
cuit. While further engineering can be used to control for In the present work, we measured the expression from a these individual factors, their effects are often non-trivial downstream promoter, PluxI. Thus, there is an additional to isolate and quantify.
stage between the sensor and reporter in our design.
Likely, expression of LuxRΔ2-162 from the PompC promo-ter is not sufficiently strong to activate the P We thank Lingchong You and Christopher Voigt for plasmids. This work was ter without further amplification. However, when we supported by National Science Foundation grants 0644744 (to CR) and add amplification by including positive feedback, we 0943386 (to KB), as well as start up funds provided by the University of then obtain robust expression.
Illinois (to KB).
1Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois In this work, we developed a simple modular genetic at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W Pennsylvania Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
2Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois amplifier based on a constitutively active variant of LuxR.
at Urbana-Champaign, 600 S Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
We tested this amplifier by coupling it to a one-compo-nent tetracycline sensor and a two-component aspartate Authors' contributionsCR and KB conceived the experiments. GN and KW performed experiments.
sensor. In both instances, the amplifier was able to CR and KB wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final increase the dynamic range and sensitivity of the inte- grated circuit. Based on these results, this amplifier most Competing interests likely can be coupled to any cell-based sensor where the The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
output involves the transcription of a gene. In theseregards, we have successfully constructed a reusable Received: 7 September 2009 Accepted: 26 February 2010Published: 26 February 2010 Nistala et al. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010, 4:4 Michalodimitrakis KM, Sourjik V, Serrano Mitrophanov AY, Groisman Mol Microbiol 2005, 58:257-266.
Bioessays 2008, 30:542-555.
Yoshida T, Phadtare S, Inouye M Onsum MD, Rao CV: Methods Enzymol 2007, 423:166-183.
Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009, Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27:368-374.
Novak B, Tyson Nat Rev Canton B, Labno A, Endy Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:981-991.
Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:787-793.
Becskei A, Seraphin B, Serrano L: Endy D: Nature 2005, 438:449-453.
Lucks JB, Qi L, Whitaker WR, Arkin AP: Embo J 2001, 20:2528-2535.
Curr Opin Microbiol 2008, Kramer BP, Fussenegger Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:9517-9522.
J Mol Biol 2006, 359:1107-1124.
Ajo-Franklin CM, Drubin DA, Eskin JA, Gee EP, Landgraf D, Phillips I, Silver PA: Genes Dev 2007,21:2271-2276.
Stricker J, Cookson S, Bennett MR, Mather WH, Tsimring LS, Hasty Cite this article as: Nistala et al.: A modular positive feedback-based Nature 2008, 456:516-519.
gene amplifier. Journal of Biological Engineering 2010 4:4.
Sayut DJ, Niu Y, Sun L: ACS Chem Biol 2006, 1:692-696.
Sayut DJ, Kambam PK, Sun LBiochem Biophys Res Commun 2007, 363:667-673.
Fuqua C, Greenberg EP: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002, 3:685-695.
Datsenko KA, Wanner BL: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000,97:6640-6645.
Lutz R, Bujard Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:1203-1210.
You L, Cox RS, Weiss R, Arnold FNature 2004, 428:868-871.
Miller WG, Leveau JH, Lindow SE: Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2000,13:1243-1250.
Stevens AM, Dolan KM, Greenberg EP: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:12619-12623.
Smith C, Song H, You L: J Mol Biol 2008, 382:1290-1297.
Urbanowski ML, Lostroh CP, Greenberg EP: J Bacteriol 2004,186:631-637.
Zhu J, Winans SC: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:1507-1512.
Poellinger KA, Lee JP, Parales JV Jr, Greenberg EFEMS Microbiol Lett 1995, 129:97-101.
Choi SH, Greenberg EProc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88:11115-11119.
Choi SH, Greenberg EJ Bacteriol 1992, 174:4064-4069.
Yao G, Lee TJ, Mori S, Nevins JR, You L: Nature cell biology 2008, 10:476-482.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
Utsumi R, Brissette RE, Rampersaud A, Forst SA, Oosawa K, Inouye M: and take full advantage of:
Science 1989, 245:1246-1249.
• Convenient online submission
Baumgartner JW, Kim C, Brissette RE, Inouye M, Park C, Hazelbauer GL: • Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
J Bacteriol 1994,176:1157-1163.
• Immediate publication on acceptance
Levskaya A, Chevalier AA, Tabor JJ, Simpson ZB, Lavery LA, Levy M, • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
Davidson EA, Scouras A, Ellington AD, Marcotte EM, Voigt • Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at
HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TIROSINT safely and effectively. • Patients unable to swallow a capsule, including young children (generally under 6 years of age) (4) See full prescribing information for TIROSINT. • Acute myocardial infarction (4) TIROSINT (levothyroxine sodium) capsules, for oral use