Microsoft word - 2015-ispppi-final-en
WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE
PROTECTION OF
PRIVACY AND PERSONAL
International Standard for the Protection
of Privacy and Personal Information
The World Anti-Doping Code International Standard for
the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information (ISPPPI) is a mandatory
International Standard developed
as part of the World Anti-Doping Program.
The International Standard for Protection of Privacy and
Personal Information was first adopted 9 May 2009 and came into effect 1 June 2009. The enclosed ISPPPI
incorporates revisions to the ISPPPI and was approved at
the World Conference on Doping in Sport in Johannesburg by the WADA Executive Committee on 15 November
2013. It will come into effect on 1 January 2015.
The official text of the International Standard for the
Protection of Privacy and Personal Information shall be
maintained by
WADA and shall be published in English and French. In the event of any conflict between the
English and French versions, the English version shall prevail.
World Anti-Doping AgencyStock Exchange Tower800 Place Victoria (Suite 1700)PO Box 120Montreal, QuebecCanada H4Z 1B7
URL: www.wada-ama.org
The World Anti-Doping International Standard for the Protection of Privacy
and Personal Information is a mandatory
International Standard developed as part of the World Anti-Doping Program.
WADA and
Anti-Doping Organizations share responsibility for ensuring that Personal Information Processed in connection with Anti-Doping Activities is
protected as required by data protection and privacy laws, principles and standards. The main purpose of this
International Standard is to ensure that organizations and
Persons involved in anti-doping in sport apply appropriate,
sufficient and effective privacy protections to Personal Information that they Process, regardless of whether this is also required by applicable laws.
A
WADA expert reference group reviewed, discussed and prepared this document, and specifically took into account the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development's (OECD) 1980 Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data; the Council of Europe
Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (ETS. No. 108); the APEC Privacy Framework;
the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995
on the Processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and other international and regional data privacy rules and standards.
The official text of the International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information shall be maintained by
WADA and shall be published in English and French. In the event of any conflict between the
English and French versions, the English version shall prevail.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART ONE: INTRODUCTION,
CODE PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS.1
Introduction and Scope .1
Code Provisions.1
Terms and Definitions .5
PART TWO: STANDARDS FOR HANDLING PERSONAL INFORMATION .7
Processing Personal Information in Accordance with
International
Standard and Applicable Law.7
Processing Relevant and Proportionate Personal Information .8
Processing Personal Information in Accordance with Law or with
Ensuring Appropriate Information is Furnished to
Participants and
Other
Persons.11
Disclosures of Personal Information to other
Anti-Doping Organizations
and Third Parties.12
Maintaining the Security of Personal Information.14
10.0 Retaining Personal Information Where Relevant and Ensuring Its
11.0 Rights of
Participants and Other
Persons with Respect to Personal
ANNEX A to the INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON PROTECTION OF
PRIVACY AND PERSONAL INFORMATION .17
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
PART ONE: INTRODUCTION, CODE PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
Introduction and Scope
The purpose of the International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and
Personal Information is to ensure that
Anti-Doping Organizations apply
appropriate, sufficient and effective privacy protections to the Personal
Information they Process when conducting anti-doping programs, in recognition of the fact that Personal Information gathered in the anti-doping context can
impinge upon and implicate the privacy rights of
Persons involved in and associated with organized sport.
The
Code, in particular, requires
Athletes and
Athlete Support Personnel to
furnish a significant amount of Personal Information
to
Anti-Doping
Organizations. As a result, it is essential that
Anti-Doping Organizations
appropriately protect the Personal Information that they Process both to meet
legal standards and to ensure the continued confidence and trust of those
involved in organized sport.
The
Code recognizes and affirms the importance of ensuring that the privacy
rights of
Persons subject to anti-doping programs based on the
Code are fully
respected. In support of this commitment, this
International Standard provides
mandatory rules and standards relating to the protection of Personal Information
by
Anti-Doping Organizations.
Consistent with other
International Standards that have been developed and
implemented to date, this
International Standard sets forth a minimum, common
set of rules to which
Anti-Doping Organizations must conform when collecting and handling Personal Information pursuant to the
Code. In some cases,
Anti-
Doping Organizations may be required by applicable laws to apply rules or standards that exceed those set forth in this Standard. For purposes of this
International Standard, definitions appearing in the
Code shall be italicized, and
additional definitions created for purposes of this
International Standard shall be
The following articles of the
Code are directly relevant to this International
Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information:
Code Article 14
Confidentiality and Reporting
The principles of coordination of anti-doping results, public transparency and
accountability and respect for the privacy of all
Athletes or other
Persons are as
14.1 Information Concerning
Adverse Analytical Findings, Atypical Findings, and
other Asserted Anti-Doping Rule Violations.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violations to
Athletes and other
The form and manner of notice of an asserted anti-doping rule violation
shall be as provided in the rules of the
Anti-Doping Organization with results management responsibility.
Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violations to
National Anti-Doping
Organizations
, International Federations and
WADA.
The
Anti-Doping Organization with results management responsibility shall
also notify the
Athlete'
s National Anti-Doping Organization, International Federation and
WADA of the assertion of an anti-doping rule violation
simultaneously with the notice to the
Athlete or other
Person.
Content of an Anti-Doping Rule Violation Notice.
Notification shall include: the
Athlete'
s name, country, sport and discipline
within the sport, the
Athlete'
s competitive level, whether the test was
In-Competition or
Out-of-Competition, the date of
Sample collection, the
analytical result reported by the laboratory and other information as
required by the International Standard for Testing and Investigations
, or
for anti-doping rule violations other than Article 2.1, the rule violated and
the basis of the asserted violation.
Status Reports.
Except with respect to investigations which have not resulted in notice of
an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 14.1.1, the
Anti-Doping
Organizations referenced in Article 14.1.2 shall be regularly updated on
the status and findings of any review or proceedings conducted pursuant to Article 7, 8 or 13 and shall be provided with a prompt written reasoned
explanation or decision explaining the resolution of the matter.
The recipient organizations shall not disclose this information beyond
those
Persons with a need to know (which would include the appropriate personnel at the applicable
National Olympic Committee, National
Federation, and team in a
Team Sport) until the
Anti-Doping Organizationwith results management responsibility has made
Public Disclosure or has
failed to make
Public Disclosure as required in Article 14.3.
[Comment to Article 14.1.5: Each Anti-Doping Organization shall provide, in its
own anti-doping rules, procedures for the protection of confidential information
and for investigating and disciplining improper disclosure of confidential
information by any employee or agent of the Anti-Doping Organization.]
Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violation Decisions and Request for
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
Anti-doping rule violation decisions rendered pursuant to
Article 7.10, 8.4, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.12.3 or 13.5 shall include the full reasons for the decision, including, if applicable, a justification
for why the maximum potential sanction was not imposed
. Where
the decision is not in English or French, the
Anti-Doping
Organization shall provide a short English or French summary of the
decision and the supporting reasons.
An
Anti-Doping Organization having a right to appeal a
decision received pursuant to Article 14.2.1 may, within 15 days of
receipt, request a copy of the full case file pertaining to the
14.3
Public Disclosure.
The identity of any
Athlete or other
Person who is
asserted by an
Anti-Doping Organization to have committed an
anti-doping rule violation, may be
Publicly Disclosed by the
Anti-
Doping Organization with results management responsibility only
after notice has been provided to the
Athlete or other
Person in accordance with Article 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 or 7.7, and to the
applicable
Anti-Doping Organizations in accordance with Article 14.1.2.
No later than twenty days after it has been determined in
a final appellate decision under Article 13.2.1 or 13.2.2, or such
appeal has been waived, or a hearing in accordance with Article 8
has been waived, or the assertion of an anti-doping rule violation
has not otherwise been timely challenged, the
Anti-Doping
Organization responsible for results management must
Publicly
Report the disposition of the anti-doping matter including the sport,
the anti-doping rule violated, the name of the
Athlete or other
Person committing the violation, the
Prohibited Substance or
Prohibited Method involved and the
Consequences imposed. The
same
Anti-Doping Organization must also
Publicly Report within twenty days the results of final appeal decisions concerning anti-
doping rule violations, including the information described above.
In any case where it is determined, after a hearing or
appeal, that the
Athlete or other
Person did not commit an anti-
doping rule violation, the decision may be
Publicly Disclosed only with the consent of the
Athlete or other
Person who is the subject
of the decision. The
Anti-Doping Organization with results
management responsibility shall use reasonable efforts to obtain
such consent, and if consent is obtained, shall
Publicly Disclose the
decision in its entirety or in such redacted form as the
Athlete or
other
Person may approve.
Publication shall be accomplished at a minimum by
placing the required information on the
Anti-Doping Organization'
swebsite and leaving the information up for the longer of one month
or the duration of any period of
Ineligibility.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
No
Anti-Doping Organization
or
WADA-accredited
laboratory, or official of either, shall publicly comment on the specific facts of any pending case (as opposed to general
description of process and science) except in response to public comments attributed to the
Athlete, other
Person or their
The mandatory
Public Reporting required in 14.3.2 shall
not be required where the
Athlete or other
Person who has been
found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation is a
Minor.
Any optional
Public Reporting in a case involving a
Minor shall be
proportionate to the facts and circumstances of the case.
14.4 Statistical Reporting.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall, at least annually, publish publicly a
general statistical report of their
Doping Control activities, with a copy
provided to
WADA. Anti-Doping Organizations may also publish reports
showing the name of each
Athlete tested and the date of each
Testing.
WADA shall, at least annually, publish statistical reports summarizing the information that it receives from
Anti-Doping Organizations and
14.5
Doping Control Information Clearinghouse.
WADA shall act as a central clearinghouse for
Doping Control Testing data
and results, including, in particular,
Athlete Biological Passport data for
International-Level Athletes and
National-Level Athletes and whereabouts
information for
Athletes including those in
Registered Testing Pools. To facilitate coordinated test distribution planning and to avoid unnecessary
duplication in
Testing by various
Anti-Doping Organizations, each
Anti-Doping Organization shall report all
In-Competition and
Out-of-
Competition tests on such
Athletes to the
WADA clearinghouse, using
ADAMS or another system approved by
WADA, as soon as possible after
such tests have been conducted. This information will be made accessible,
where appropriate and in accordance with the applicable rules, to the
Athlete, the
Athlete's National Anti-Doping Organization and International
Federation, and any other
Anti-Doping Organizations with
Testing
authority over the
Athlete.
To enable it to serve as a clearinghouse for
Doping Control Testing data
and results management decisions,
WADA has developed a database management tool,
ADAMS, that reflects data privacy principles. In
particular,
WADA has developed
ADAMS to be consistent with data privacy
statutes and norms applicable to
WADA and other organizations using
ADAMS. Private information regarding an
Athlete, Athlete Support
Personnel, or others involved in anti-doping activities shall be maintained
by
WADA, which is supervised by Canadian privacy authorities, in strict
confidence and in accordance with the International Standard for the
Protection of Privacy and Personal Information.
14.6 Data Privacy.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
Anti-Doping Organizations may collect, store, process or disclose personal
information relating to
Athletes and other
Persons where necessary and appropriate to conduct their anti-doping activities under the
Code and
International Standards (including specifically the International Standardfor the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information), and in compliance
with applicable law.
[Comment to Article 14.6: Note that Article 22.2 provides that "Each
government will put in place legislation, regulation, policies or administrative
practices for cooperation and sharing of information with Anti-Doping
Organizations and sharing of data among Anti-Doping Organizations as provided
in the Code."]
Terms and Definitions
Selected Defined Terms from the Code
Anti-Doping Organization: A
Signatory that is responsible for adopting rules
for initiating, implementing or enforcing any part of the
Doping Control process.
This includes, for example, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, other
Major Event Organizations that
conduct
Testing at their
Events,
WADA, International Federations, and
National Anti-Doping Organizations.
Athlete: Any
Person who competes in sport at the international level (as defined
by each International Federation) or the national level (as defined by each
National Anti-Doping Organization). An
Anti-Doping Organization has discretion
to apply anti-doping rules to an
Athlete who is neither an
International-Level Athlete nor a
National-Level Athlete, and thus to bring them within the definition
of "Athlete." In relation to
Athletes who are neither
International-Level nor
National-Level Athletes, an
Anti-Doping Organization may elect to: conduct
limited
Testing or no
Testing at all; analyze
Samples for less than the full menu
of
Prohibited Substances; require limited or no whereabouts information; or not
require advance
TUEs. However, if an Article 2.1, 2.3 or 2.5 anti-doping rule
violation is committed by any
Athlete over whom an
Anti-Doping Organization
has authority who competes below the international or national level, then the
Consequences set forth in the
Code (except Article 14.3.2) must be applied. For
purposes of Article 2.8 and Article 2.9 and for purposes of anti-doping information and education, any
Person who participates in sport under the
authority of any
Signatory, government, or other sports organization accepting the
Code is an
Athlete.
[Comment: This definition makes it clear that all International- and National-
Level Athletes are subject to the anti-doping rules of the Code, with the precise
definitions of international- and national-level sport to be set forth in the anti-
doping rules of the International Federations and National Anti-Doping
Organizations, respectively. The definition also allows each National Anti-Doping
Organization, if it chooses to do so, to expand its anti-doping program beyond
International- or National-Level Athletes to competitors at lower levels of Competition or to individuals who engage in fitness activities but do not compete
at all. Thus, a National Anti-Doping Organization could, for example, elect to test
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
recreational-level competitors but not require advance TUEs. But an anti-doping
rule violation involving an Adverse Analytical Finding or Tampering results in all of the Consequences provided for in the Code (with the exception of Article
14.3.2). The decision on whether Consequences apply to recreational-level Athletes who engage in fitness activities but never compete is left to the National
Anti-Doping Organization. In the same manner, a Major Event Organization
holding an Event only for masters-level competitors could elect to test the
competitors but not analyze Samples for the full menu of Prohibited Substances.
Competitors at all levels of Competition should receive the benefit of anti-doping
information and education.]
Athlete Support Personnel: Any coach, trainer, manager, agent, team staff,
official, medical, paramedical personnel, parent or any other
Person working with, treating or assisting an
Athlete participating in or preparing for sports
Participant: Any
Athlete or
Athlete Support Person.
Defined Terms from the International Standard on Privacy and
Anti-Doping Activities: Activities specified by the
Code and the
International
Standards to be carried out by
Anti-Doping Organizations, and their Third-Party Agents, for the purpose of establishing whether anti-doping rule violations took
place, including collecting whereabouts information; conducting
Testing;
performing results management; determining whether an
Athlete'
s Use of a
Prohibited Substance or
Prohibited Method is strictly limited to legitimate and
documented therapeutic purposes; educating
Participants on their rights and
responsibilities; conducting investigations into anti-doping rule violations; and
initiating legal proceedings against those who are alleged to have committed
such a violation.
Personal Information: Information, including without limitation Sensitive
Personal Information, relating to an identified or identifiable
Participant or
relating to other
Persons whose information is Processed solely in the context of
an
Anti-Doping Organization'
s Anti-Doping Activities.
[3.2 Comment: It is understood that Personal Information includes, but is not limited to, information relating to an Athlete's name, date of birth, contact
details and sporting affiliations, whereabouts, designated therapeutic use exemptions (if any), anti-doping test results, and results management (including
disciplinary hearings, appeals and sanctions). Personal Information also includes
personal details and contact information relating to other Persons, such as
medical professionals and other Persons working with, treating or assisting an
Athlete in the context of Anti-Doping Activities. Such information remains
Personal Information and is regulated by this Standard for the entire duration of
its Processing, irrespective of whether the relevant individual remains involved in
organized sport.]
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
Processing (and its cognates, Process and Processed): Collecting, retaining,
storing, disclosing, transferring, transmitting, amending, deleting or otherwise making use of Personal Information.
Security Breach: Any unauthorized and/or unlawful Processing of, including access to, Personal Information whether in electronic or hard-copy or other
form, or interference with an information system, that compromises the privacy,
security, confidentiality or integrity of Personal Information.
Sensitive Personal Information: Personal Information relating to a
Participant's
racial or ethnic origin, commission of offences (criminal or otherwise), health (including information derived from analyzing an
Athlete's Samples or
Specimens) and genetic information.
Third Party: Any natural
Person or legal entity other than the natural
Person to
whom the relevant Personal Information relates,
Anti-Doping Organizations and
Third-Party Agents.
Third-Party Agent: Any natural or legal
Person, public authority, agency or body,
including without limitation subcontractors and their subcontractors, that
Processes Personal Information for or on behalf of an
Anti-Doping Organization.
PART TWO: STANDARDS FOR HANDLING PERSONAL INFORMATION
Processing Personal Information in Accordance with International
Standard and Applicable Law
This
International Standard sets forth a minimum set of requirements
of Personal Information by
Anti-Doping
Organizations and their Third-Party Agents in the context of their Anti-Doping
Activities. All
Anti-Doping Organizations must comply with this Standard, even
when its requirements exceed those arising under the
Anti-Doping Organization'
s
applicable data protection and/or privacy laws, reflecting the vital need to
protect the privacy of
Participants and other
Persons involved in and associated
with anti-doping in sport.
[4.1 Comment: Anti-Doping Organizations, along with any Third-Party Agents
that Process Personal Information for or on behalf of Anti-Doping Organizations, minimally must comply with the requirements set forth in this International
Standard, provided that such compliance does not breach other applicable laws.
In cases where compliance with the requirements of this International Standard
may cause an Anti-Doping Organization to breach other applicable laws, those
laws shall prevail. This result will not lead to a determination of non-compliance
with the World Anti-Doping Code.]
Anti-Doping Organizations may be subject to data protection and privacy
laws and regulations that impose requirements that exceed those arising under this
International Standard. In such circumstances,
Anti-Doping Organizations
must ensure that their Processing of Personal Information complies with all such data protection and privacy laws and regulations
.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
[4.2 Comment: Anti-Doping Organizations in certain countries may be subject to
laws and regulations that govern their Processing of Personal Informationrelating to natural Persons in addition to Participants, such as their own
employees or staff employed by other Anti-Doping Organizations, or impose additional restrictions going beyond this International Standard. In all such
cases, Anti-Doping Organizations are expected to comply with applicable data
protection laws and regulations.]
Processing Relevant and Proportionate Personal Information
Anti-Doping Organizations shall only Process Personal Information where
relevant, in order to conduct Anti-Doping Activities under the
Code and
International Standards, or where otherwise required by applicable law,
regulation or compulsory legal process, provided such Processing does not
conflict with applicable privacy and data protection laws.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall not Process Personal Information that is
irrelevant or unnecessary in the context of their Anti-Doping Activities as
identified in Article 5.1.
[5.2 Comment: Anti-Doping Organizations shall examine the different contexts in which they Process Personal Information to ensure that the Processing of the
Personal Information in any given case is required in order to satisfy one of the purposes identified in Article 5.1. Where Anti-Doping Organizations cannot
satisfy themselves that the Processing is necessary, they shall refrain from Processing the Personal Information.]
In particular, except as otherwise required by the
Code or expressly
a. Anti-Doping Organizations Processing Personal Information (which may
involve Processing Sensitive Personal Information relating to
Athletes and Processing non-Sensitive Personal Information relating to
Participants and
potentially other
Persons) in order to determine whether an
Athlete'
s Use
of a
Prohibited Substance or
Prohibited Method is strictly limited to
legitimate and documented therapeutic purposes, shall Process only the
Personal Information
appropriate and relevant
determination as required by the International Standard for Therapeutic
Use Exemptions.
b.
Anti-Doping Organizations Processing Personal Information relating to
Participants and other
Persons in order to perform
Testing, shall Process
only the Personal Information (including whereabouts information and Therapeutic Use Exemptions) appropriate and relevant for conducting
Testing (e.g., test distribution planning,
Sample collection,
Sample
handling,
Sample transport to the laboratory or associated matters) in
accordance with the
Code and/or the International Standard for Testing
and Investigations.
c.
Anti-Doping Organizations Processing Personal Information relating to
Participants and other
Persons in order to engage in investigation and
results management (including associated disciplinary hearings, appeals
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
and adjudications) shall Process only the Personal Information, including
but not limited to whereabouts information, Therapeutic Use Exemptions, and test results, appropriate and relevant for investigating and
establishing one or more anti-doping rule violations.
d.
Anti-Doping Organizations may Process Personal Information relating
to
Participants and other
Persons for other specified purposes, provided
that those purposes relate exclusively to the fight against doping and are
found to be relevant to that fight following an appropriately documented
assessment performed by the
Anti-Doping Organization.
[5.3.d. Comment: In certain contexts, it may be appropriate or necessary for
Anti-Doping Organizations to Process Personal Information for additional
purposes, besides those identified in Articles 5.3.a.-c., in order to engage
effectively in the fight against doping. Such purposes may include, for example,
the development and improvement of test planning and Testing procedures and
processes. Such Processing must be exclusively linked to the fight against
doping and may only occur where the Anti-Doping Organization has documented
the need to perform such Processing.]
Personal Information Processed by
Anti-Doping Organizations shall be
processed fairly and shall be accurate, complete and kept up-to-date.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall correct or amend as soon as possible any Personal
Information that they know to be incorrect or inaccurate, taking into account the responsibilities of
Participants such as under Article 14.3 of the
Code and Article
11 of the International Standard for Testing and Investigations.
[5.4 Comment: Where Participants are responsible for providing Personal
Information about themselves directly to Anti-Doping Organizations and for
keeping it accurate, complete and up-to-date, they should be informed of this
obligation and, whenever practicable, offered reasonable means to fulfill it. For
instance, this could involve furnishing individuals with access to their Personal
Information via the Internet through online tools and resources.]
Processing Personal Information in Accordance with Law or with
Anti-Doping Organizations shall only Process Personal Information:
on valid legal grounds, which can include compliance with legal
obligations, fulfillment of a contract or to protect the vital interests of the
Participant and other
Persons; or
where permitted, with a
Participant's or other
Person's informed
consent, subject to the exceptions in Article 6.2.b, 6.3 and 6.4 of this
[6.1 Comment: This International Standard envisions that Personal Informationwill be Processed in cases where the law expressly provides for its Processing or
with the consent of Participants, subject to appropriate exceptions to avoid Participants or other ersons undermining the Code. Principal responsibility for
obtaining the consent of an Athlete, and/or his or her associated Athlete Support
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
Personnel, shall rest with the Anti-Doping Organization(s) that places the
relevant Athlete in its Registered Testing Pool.]
Where
Anti-Doping Organizations Process Personal Information with
consent,
Anti-Doping Organizations shall, in order to obtain an informed consent, ensure that adequate information is furnished to the
Participant or
Person to
whom the Personal Information relates as described more fully in Article 7.
a.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall inform
Participants of the negative
Consequences that could arise from their refusal to participate in
Doping
Controls, including
Testing, and of the refusal to consent to the Processingof Personal Information as required for this purpose.
[6.2.a. Comment: For the avoidance of doubt, Participants shall be informed that
their refusal to participate in Doping Controls, when requested to do so, could
prevent their continued involvement in organized sport and, for Athletes,
constitute a violation of the Code and invalidate Competition results, among
other things. A Participant who believes that an Anti-Doping Organization does
not comply with this International Standard may notify WADA pursuant to Article
11.5, which shall, without prejudice to any other rights the Participant may have under applicable law, consider the grounds for the complaint.]
b.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall inform
Participants that regardless of any refusal to grant or subsequent withdrawal of consent, the Processing
of their Personal Information by
Anti-Doping Organizations still may be required, unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law, where necessary
to enable
Anti-Doping Organizations:
to commence or pursue investigations involving suspected anti-doping rule violations relating to the
Participant;
to conduct or participate in proceedings involving suspected anti-doping rule violations relating to the
Participant; or
to establish, exercise or defend against legal claims relating to the
Anti-Doping Organization, the
Participant or both.
[6.2.b. Comment: In certain limited circumstances, Anti-Doping Organizations
must have the ability to Process Personal Information in the absence of the Participant's consent. These exceptions are necessary to avoid situations where
Participants refuse to grant consent or withdraw consent in order to circumvent
anti-doping efforts and procedures and evade detection for a doping violation.]
Where
Anti-Doping Organizations Process Sensitive Personal Information
with consent, the express and written consent of the
Participant or
Person to
whom the Personal Information relates shall be obtained. The Processing of
Sensitive Personal Information shall occur in accordance with any specific
safeguards or procedures established under applicable data protection laws and regulations.
[6.3 Comment: This International Standard imposes additional restrictions where Anti-Doping Organizations Process Sensitive Personal Information, reflecting the
greater sensitivities surrounding the Processing of such information. Although
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
the Standard defines Sensitive Personal Information to expressly include
different classes of information, this is not to suggest that such information should be Processed by Anti-Doping Organizations, as required by Article 5.1.]
In cases where a
Participant
is incapable of furnishing an informed
consent by virtue of age, mental capacity or other legitimate reason recognized
in law, the
Participant's legal representative, guardian or other competent
representative may furnish consent on the
Participant's behalf for purposes of
this
International Standard, as well as exercise the
Participant's rights arising
under Article 11 below.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall ensure that obtaining
consents under such circumstances is permitted by applicable law.
Ensuring Appropriate Information is Furnished to Participants and
An
Anti-Doping Organization shall inform
Participants or
Persons to whom
the Personal Information relates about the Processing of their Personal
Information. This information shall include:
the identity of the
Anti-Doping Organization collecting the Personal
types of Personal Information that may be Processed;
the purposes for which the Personal Information may be used and how
long it may be retained;
other potential recipients of the Personal Information, including
Anti-
Doping Organizations located in other countries where the
Participant may
compete, train or travel;
the possibility and circumstances under which Personal Information
may, where permitted by applicable law, be
Publicly Disclosed (such as the disclosure of test results and tribunal decisions);
the
Participant's rights with respect to the Personal Information under
this
International Standard and the means to exercise those rights, including the procedure for submitting complaints pursuant to Article
any other information necessary to ensure that the Processing of the
Personal Information remains fair, such as information about regulatory
authorities or bodies that oversee the
Anti-Doping Organization's
Processing of Personal Information.
7.2. Anti-Doping Organizations shall communicate the above information to
Participants or other
Persons prior to or at the time that they collect Personal
Information from
Participants or other
Persons, and
Anti-Doping Organizations
shall be responsive to the questions or concerns of
Participants relating to the Processing of their Personal Information by the
Anti-Doping Organization. Where
Anti-Doping Organizations receive Personal Information from Third Parties, and not directly from the
Participant, they shall communicate the above information
as soon as possible and without undue delay, unless it has previously been
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
furnished to the
Participant or other
Person by other parties. Exceptionally,
notice to the
Participant or other
Persons may be delayed or suspended where providing such notice might reasonably be considered to jeopardize an anti-
doping investigation or otherwise undermine the integrity of the anti-doping process. In such cases, the justification for the delay must be appropriately
documented and the information provided to the
Participant or other
Persons as
soon as reasonably possible.
[7.2 Comment: Anti-Doping Organizations should recognize that basic principles
of fairness require that where a Participant's Personal Information is Processed
in the context of Anti-Doping Activities, he or she should receive or have access
to information that explains in simple terms the purpose and procedures for the
collection and processing of their Personal Information. This International Standard aspires to ensure that Participants acquire a basic grasp of the roles
and responsibilities performed by the different organizations involved in anti-doping in sport, as those relate to the Processing of Personal Information. Under
no circumstances should Anti-Doping Organizations seek to mislead or misinform
Participants in order to collect or use their Personal Information.
Each Anti-Doping Organization should ensure that its Processing of Personal
Information is reasonably transparent to Participants, notwithstanding the fact that certain information relating to Anti-Doping Activities, notably information
concerning scheduled Testing and investigations and proceedings relating to anti-doping rule violations, may need to be temporarily withheld from
Participants in order to maintain the integrity of the anti-doping process.
Similarly, notice to Participants also may need to be temporarily withheld if
providing the information might reasonably risk jeopardizing an ongoing or
imminent investigation into doping-related activities conducted by an Anti-
Doping Organization or law enforcement agencies. The prompt provision of
appropriate information to Participants pursuant to this Article 7 is essential
given the serious, adverse consequences that might arise if Participants are found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation.]
Anti-Doping Organizations shall provide the above information, together
with the contact details of the accountable
Person appointed pursuant to Section
9.1, in a manner and format, whether written, oral or otherwise, that
Participants or
Persons to whom the Personal Information relates can easily
comprehend, taking into account local practices, customs and the particular
circumstances surrounding the Processing of the Personal Information.
[7.3 Comment: Anti-Doping Organizations need to determine the most effective
means of providing information in particular cases, recognizing that furnishing
Participants with written notice is to be preferred when practical. This also may include furnishing notices through generally available sources, such as brochures
and Internet websites, alone or preferably in combination with more succinct notices on forms and other documentation provided directly to Participants.]
Disclosures of Personal Information
to other Anti-Doping
Organizations and Third Parties
Anti-Doping Organizations shall not disclose Personal Information to other
Anti-Doping Organizations except where such disclosures are necessary to allow
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
the
Anti-Doping Organizations receiving the Personal Information to fulfill
obligations under the
Code and in accordance with applicable privacy and data protection laws.
[8.1 Comment: In many instances required by the Code, it is necessary for Anti-Doping Organizations to share certain Personal Information relating to
Participants with other Anti-Doping Organizations so that they may engage in
Code-mandated Testing. For instance, this may occur in order to subject
Athletes to In-Competition and Out-of-Competition Testing. In such cases, Anti-
Doping Organizations shall cooperate with one another to ensure that the
participation by Participants in such Testing remains suitably transparent to
Participants and complies with the rules set out in this International Standard
and applicable laws.]
Anti-Doping Organizations shall not disclose Personal Information to other
Anti-Doping Organizations: (i) where the recipient
Anti-Doping Organizations
cannot establish a right, authority or need to obtain the Personal Information;
(ii) where there is evidence that the recipient
Anti-Doping Organizations do not
or cannot comply with this
International Standard; (iii) where the
Anti-Doping Organization is prohibited from disclosing the Personal Information by applicable
law or restrictions imposed by a competent supervisory authority; or (iv) where the disclosure would seriously compromise the status of an ongoing investigation
into anti-doping rule violations. Where an
Anti-Doping Organization has concerns that another
Anti-Doping Organization is incapable of complying with this
International Standard, it shall make its concerns known to the
Anti-Doping
Organization and
WADA as soon as possible.
Apart from the disclosures referenced in Sections 8.1 and 8.2 above,
Anti-
Doping Organizations may disclose Personal Information to Third Parties where
such disclosures:
a. are required by law, regulation or compulsory legal process;
b. take place with the informed, express and written consent of the
relevant
Participant; or
c. are necessary to assist law enforcement or governmental or other
authorities in the detection, investigation or prosecution of a criminal
offence or breach of the
Code, provided that the Personal Information is
reasonably relevant to the offence in question and cannot otherwisereasonably be obtained by the authorities.
[8.3.c. Comment: The ability of an Anti-Doping Organization to cooperate and exchange Personal Information with law enforcement agencies and the manner
by which this is to occur may depend upon applicable national laws and
regulations. Such rules may sometimes require or encourage Anti-Doping
Organizations to disclose Personal Information to law enforcement when they
are aware that this information may be relevant to an investigation. Anti-Doping
Organizations must comply with such national obligations where they exist.]
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
Maintaining the Security of Personal Information
Anti-Doping Organizations shall designate a
Person who is accountable for
compliance with this
International Standard and all locally applicable privacy and
data protection laws. They shall take reasonable measures to ensure that the name and contact information of the
Person so designated is made readily
available to
Participants should they request it.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall protect Personal Information that they
Process by applying all necessary security safeguards, including physical,
organizational, technical, environmental and other measures, to prevent the loss, theft, or unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure
(including disclosures made via electronic networks) of Personal Information.
[9.2 Comment: Anti-Doping Organizations shall ensure that any access to
Personal Information by their own personnel shall take place on a need-to-know
basis only and where consistent with assigned roles and responsibilities.
Personnel accessing Personal Information should be informed of the need to hold
Personal Information in confidence.]
Anti-Doping Organizations shall apply security measures that take into
account the sensitivity of the Personal Information being Processed.
Anti-Doping
Organizations shall apply a higher level of security to the Sensitive Personal Information that they Process, reflecting the correspondingly greater risk that
the unlawful or unauthorized disclosure of such information presents to the
Participant or
Person to whom the Personal Information relates.
Anti-Doping Organizations disclosing Personal Information to Third-Party
Agents in connection with their Anti-Doping Activities shall ensure that such Third-Party Agents are subject to appropriate controls, including contractual
controls, in order to protect the confidentiality and privacy of the Personal Information and to ensure that the Personal Information is only Processed for
and on behalf of the
Anti- Doping Organization.
[9.4 Comment: Anti-Doping Organizations have an ongoing responsibility to
protect any Personal Information under their effective control or in their
possession, including Personal Information Processed by their Third-Party
Agents, such as IT-service providers, laboratories and external Doping Control
Anti-Doping Organizations are required to choose Third-Party Agents that
provide sufficient guarantees, in accordance with applicable law and this
Standard, in respect of the technical security measures and organizational measures governing the Processing to be carried out.
In the event of a Security Breach, the responsible
Anti-Doping
Organization shall inform affected
Participants or other
Persons of the breach, where this breach is likely to affect in a significant way the rights and interests
of those
persons concerned. The information must be provided as soon as reasonably possible once the
Anti-Doping Organization becomes aware of the
details of the Security Breach and should describe the nature of the breach, the
possible negative
Consequences for those
Persons concerned and the
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
remediation measures taken or to be taken by the
Anti-Doping Organization.
Additionally, the
Anti-Doping Organization shall ensure that the
Personappointed pursuant to Section 9.1 is also informed about the Security Breach.
[9.6 Comment: Security
Breach notification obligations are becoming
increasingly common throughout the world. Pursuant to Article 4 of this
Standard, Anti-Doping Organizations must comply with national obligations that
go beyond the Standard (i.e., some national regimes may require additional
notification to a competent authority or impose specific timeframes for
notification). A breach does not significantly affect an individual when the
Personal Information in question is subject to suitable technological protection
measures (e.g., encryption) and there is no indication that the protection has been compromised. Notice shall be given by any appropriate means, whether
written, verbally or otherwise, taking into account the particular circumstances of the Security Breach, including the prejudice that the relevant Persons may
suffer as a result of the Security Breach.]
10.0 Retaining Personal Information Where Relevant and Ensuring Its
10.1 As a general rule, retaining Sensitive Personal Information requires
stronger or more compelling reasons and justifications than retaining non-
Sensitive Personal Information.
10.2 Anti-Doping Organizations shall ensure that Personal Information is only
retained where it remains relevant to fulfilling their obligations under the
Code
or under this Standard or where otherwise required by applicable law, regulation
or compulsory legal process. Once Personal Information no longer serves the
above purposes, it shall be deleted, destroyed or permanently anonymized.
10.3 In order to ensure the effective application of Article 10.1,
Anti-Doping
Organizations shall establish clear retention times to govern their Processing of
Personal Information consistent with the above-described limitations.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall develop specific plans and procedures to ensure the
secure retention and eventual destruction of Personal Information.
10.4 Different retention times may be applied to different types of Personal
Information and shall take into account the purposes for which the Personal
Information is Processed in the context of Anti-Doping Activities, including the granting of Therapeutic Use Exemptions,
Testing, the investigation of doping
violations, and the sanctioning of such violations.
Anti-Doping Organizationsshall adhere to those retention times set forth in Annex A (Retention Times), as
amended from time to time.
11.0 Rights of Participants and Other Persons with Respect to Personal
11.1 Participants or
Persons to whom the Personal Information relates shall
have the right to obtain from
Anti-Doping Organizations: (a) confirmation of
whether or not
Anti-Doping Organizations Process Personal Information relating
to them, (b) the information as per Article 7.1, and (c) a copy of the relevant Personal Information within a reasonable timeframe, in a readily intelligible
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
format, and without excessive cost, unless to do so in a particular case plainly
conflicts with the
Anti-Doping Organization'
s ability to plan or conduct
No Advance Notice Testing or to investigate and establish anti-doping rule
[11.1 Comment: Save in exceptional circumstances, (which may
situations where the amount of Personal Information at issue is significant and
involves a disproportionate effort to assemble), an Anti-Doping Organization
ordinarily is expected to respond no later than 6 to 8 weeks from the date the
request is received.]
11.2 Anti-Doping Organizations have to respond to requests from
Participants
or
Persons to whom the Personal Information relates seeking access to their
Personal Information, except if doing so imposes a disproportionate burden on
the
Anti-Doping Organizations in terms of cost or effort given the nature of the
Personal Information in question.
11.3 In the event an
Anti-Doping Organization refuses to allow a
Participant
access to his or her Personal Information, it shall inform the
Participant and set
out in writing the reasons for refusing the request as soon as practicable.
Anti-Doping Organizations shall ensure that
Participants only obtain Personal
Information relating to themselves, and not relating to other
Participants or third
Persons, where they seek to obtain access to Personal Information pursuant to
this Article 11.
11.4 Where an
Anti-Doping Organization'
s Processing of Personal Information is
shown to be inaccurate, incomplete, or excessive, it shall, as appropriate,
rectify, amend or delete the relevant Personal Information as soon as possible. If
the
Anti-Doping Organization has disclosed the Personal Information in question
to another
Anti-Doping Organization that to its knowledge or belief continues to
Process the Personal Information, it shall inform that
Anti-Doping Organization of
the change as soon as possible, unless this proves impossible or involves a
11.5 Without prejudice to any other rights a
Participant may have under
applicable laws, a
Participant shall be entitled to initiate a complaint with an
Anti-Doping Organization where he or she has a reasonable, good-faith belief
that an
Anti-Doping Organization is not complying with this
International
Standard and each
Anti-Doping Organization shall have a procedure in place for dealing with such complaints in a fair and impartial manner. In the event that
the complaint cannot be satisfactorily resolved, the
Participant may notify
WADAand/or submit a complaint to
CAS, which will determine whether a violation
occurred. Where the
International Standard is not being adhered to, the relevant
Anti-Doping Organization will be required to rectify the breach.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
ANNEX A to the INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND PERSONAL INFORMATION
ADRV: anti-doping rule violation
AAF:
adverse analytical finding
ATF:
atypical finding
NAF: non-analytical finding
Referenced data will be deleted no later than the end of the calendar quarter following the expiry of the stated retention period.
II. For practical reasons, retention times are submitted to two categories; 18 months and 10 years.
III. Retention times can be extended in case of pending anti-doping rule violations.
1 – Athlete
as of time when
Athlete
Athlete data relevant for practical purposes and because of multiple
is excluded from ADO's
Testing pool:
These data are not particularly sensitive.
Managed by ADO.
Athlete (general)
This can be retained indefinitely. ADOs should be allowed to keep a record
of
Athletes that have been part of their
Testing pool. For elite
Athletes, this
Sport discipline
information is public information anyway.
10 years because of possible ADRV: AAF/ATF (stored
Sample) or NAF
10 years because of possible ADRV: AAF/ATF (stored
Sample) or NAF
10 years because of possible ADRV: AAF/ATF (stored
Sample) or NAF
2 – Whereabouts
as of date to which the
Only small amount of Whereabouts is relevant to retain, but it is
(except for the
Athlete
impossible to establish which part.
Passport program see
Can be relevant to establish ADRV retrospectively
Relevant to count three Strikes in 12 months time
Relevant to count three Strikes in 12 months time
If ADRV, will be kept as part of disciplinary file indefinitely (see section 7).
3 – TUE
Destroying medical information makes it impossible for WADA
to review TUEs retrospectively after TUE has lost its validity
TUE information is largely medical and therefore specifically
Managed by ADO / TUEC.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
TUE approval forms
10 yrs as of approval
Can be relevant in case of re-
testing.
TUE supp. med information
Loses relevance after expiration of
TUE except in case of re-application (and Proportionality
TUE info not included:
18 month from end of
(i) on the approval form;
validity of
TUE
(ii) in the supporting
medical information
4 – Testing
as of document creation
Long retention only relevant in case of AAF, ATF, ADRV or stored
date / as of first
indication of AAF, ATF,
Managed by ADO.
Sample collection
18 months if there is no indication of an ADRV/ 10 yrs if there is an
18 months / 10 yrs
indication of a possible ADRV, if the
Sample is stored for possible re-
testing
or if it is part of a passport program.
Doping Control Form
18 months if there is no indication of an ADRV/ 10 yrs if there is an
18 months / 10 yrs
indication of a possible ADRV, if the
Sample is stored for possible re-
testing /Necessity
or if is part of a passport program.
Chain of Custody
18 months if there is no indication of an ADRV/ 10 yrs if there is an
18 months/ 10 yrs
indication of a possible ADRV, if the
Sample is stored for possible re-
testing
or if it is part of a passport program.
5 – Samples (lab)
Only positive Samples are a possible privacy issue
Managed by Laboratory
Indefinitely / 10 yrs
These
Samples are anonymous, and may be retained indefinitely for
Indefinitely / 10 yrs
In case of an AAF, and if the
Sample is identifiable, 10 yrs should be the
maximum retention time.
6 – Test results/Results
as of creation of relevant
Relevant because of multiple violations and retrospective analysis
management
Managed by ADO
Negative findings
Negative results have an historical value and keeping them could be in the
interest of the
Athlete.
Necessary because of multiple violations.
Necessary because of multiple violations.
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
7 – Disciplinary Rulings
Relevant because of multiple violations.
Managed by disciplinary body / sports federation / ADO.
Disciplinary rulings
Sanctions under the
Code
Should be kept indefinitely for legal and precedential value.
Relevant supporting
8 – Athlete Biological Passport*
* Differentiation between
Samples and results. As
Samples are not used for directly establishing ADRV,
Samples will not be stored, only results.
* For blood there are no A or B
Samples.
* Only positive
Samples are a possible privacy issue. Biological passport
Samples are not positive
Samples.
10 yrs as of date results
For the biological passport (blood module), the endocrinological/steroidal
urine modules or longitudinal profiling, the retention time for results is 10
10 yrs when needed to support atypical/abnormal results/to refute
Athlete's
10 yrs as of date the
For cases where circumstances warrant for negative results to be stored for
future inclusion in the biological passport (blood
module/endocrinological/steroidal urine modules): 10 yrs (only needed for
limited amount of
Athletes).
2015 ISPPPI – 20 February 2014
Source: http://www.ukad.org.uk/resources/document-download/asthma-medications/%E2%80%8E
Clinical evaluation of a powder of quality elk velvet antler for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dogs Maxim Moreau, Jacques Dupuis, Norbert H Bonneau, Manon Lécuyer Abstract — A powder of quality elk velvet antler (QEVA) was evaluated on client-owned dogs with osteoarthrosis (OA) in a clinical, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Thirteen dogs received
DIVISION OF MEDICAID AND LONG-TERM CARE PHARMACEUTICAL AND THERAPEUTICS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES May 13, 2015 at 9 a.m., CST Mahoney State Park, Peter Kiewit Lodge Claire Baker, M.D. Jenny Minchow, Pharm.D. Stacie Bleicher, M.D. Abigail Anderson, M.C.R.P. Kristie Bohac, M.D. Shelly Nickerson, Pharm.D. Chris Caudill, M.D. Yvonne Davenport, M.D.